{"id":306,"date":"2015-01-05T23:31:35","date_gmt":"2015-01-06T04:31:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tasharp.com\/?p=306"},"modified":"2020-01-19T13:20:49","modified_gmt":"2020-01-19T18:20:49","slug":"but-what-is-qft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/but-what-is-qft\/","title":{"rendered":"The step from Quantum Mechanics to Quantum Field Theory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There are several things that can still be confusing about\u00a0quantum field theory (QFT) even if one already knows\u00a0quantum mechanics.\u00a0 For example, how does QFT\u00a0relate to the\u00a0single-particle Schr\u00f6dinger equation? For one, a single particle wave function <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=+%5Cphi%28%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%29+&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\" &#92;phi(&#92;bold{x}) \" class=\"latex\" \/> is already a continuous field, but quantum field theory refers to more than single-particle quantum mechanics. Moreover, we know that two particles are described in quantum mechanics as a six-dimensional wavefunction, yet quantum field theory discusses quantum fields that permeate all of space, in only three dimensions.\u00a0 The purpose of this post is to briefly summarize the steps from single-body to many-body quantum mechanics, which clarifies these questions.\u00a0 We follow the\u00a0canonical quantization method.\u00a0 The intended audience is someone familiar with quantum field theory calculations, but wanting a reminder of its meaning.<\/p><p>Our starting point is a familiarity with\u00a0quantum mechanics. \u00a0One knows from quantum mechanics that a <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=N&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"N\" class=\"latex\" \/>-particle wavefunction is <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=3N&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"3N\" class=\"latex\" \/>-dimensional. \u00a0For instance, for <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=N%3D3&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"N=3\" class=\"latex\" \/>, the wavefunction is written in position basis as <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5Cphi%28%5Cbold%7Bx_1%7D%2C%5Cbold%7Bx_2%7D%2C%5Cbold%7Bx_3%7D%29&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;phi(&#92;bold{x_1},&#92;bold{x_2},&#92;bold{x_3})\" class=\"latex\" \/> where <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5Cbold%7Bx_1%7D&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;bold{x_1}\" class=\"latex\" \/> is the 3-dimensional position of particle 1. \u00a0Recall that, for two identical particles, only the phase of a wavefunction changes if two of the particles are permuted, and in fact we can accept as experimental\u00a0fact that the wavefunction is\u00a0either completely symmetric (bosons) or anti-symmetric (fermions) under permutation. Note that the wavefunction notation above makes reference to which particle is which, and so for identical particles there is extra, non-physical information in the above notation. \u00a0In fact, the symmetry means that it has <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=1%2FN%21&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"1\/N!\" class=\"latex\" \/> fewer distinct points in its domain than expected (i.e. than <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=R%5E%7B3N%7D&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"R^{3N}\" class=\"latex\" \/>). \u00a0This suggests that there is actually a more elegant way to describe the state. \u00a0The more efficient way is in the basis of occupation number, which does not distinguish <em>which<\/em>\u00a0particle is occupying each 3D-location, only how much each position is occupied. \u00a0This better basis for identical particles is called Fock space. \u00a0The Fock space vector <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5CPsi%28%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%29&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;Psi(&#92;bold{x})\" class=\"latex\" \/> means that there is <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5CPsi%28%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%29&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;Psi(&#92;bold{x})\" class=\"latex\" \/> amplitude for particles being at 3D position <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5Cbold%7Bx%7D&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;bold{x}\" class=\"latex\" \/>.\u00a0 Rather than position basis, these vectors are often written in wavevector basis, but for conceptualizing them at this point, we can remain in position space.<\/p><p>Now recall\u00a0the mathematical usefulness of the creation and annihilation operators of the 1D simple harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics, <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=+a%5E%5Cdagger_i&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\" a^&#92;dagger_i\" class=\"latex\" \/> and <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=+a_i&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\" a_i\" class=\"latex\" \/>. These operators create or annihilate a particle in the state <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=i&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"i\" class=\"latex\" \/>. \u00a0That is, <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=+a%5E%5Cdagger_2+%C2%A0%5Clvert+0+0+0+...+%5Crangle%3D+%5Clvert+0+1+0+...%5Crangle&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\" a^&#92;dagger_2 \u00a0&#92;lvert 0 0 0 ... &#92;rangle= &#92;lvert 0 1 0 ...&#92;rangle\" class=\"latex\" \/> adds one particle to the location <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%3D%5Cbold%7Bx%7D_2&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;bold{x}=&#92;bold{x}_2\" class=\"latex\" \/>. \u00a0We can define\u00a0the so-called field operators that create a particle in eigenstate <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=%5Clvert+%5Cbold%7Bx%7D+%5Crangle&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\"&#92;lvert &#92;bold{x} &#92;rangle\" class=\"latex\" \/> as <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=+%5CPsi%28%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%29+%3D+%5Csum+%5Cphi%5E%2A_i%28%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%29+a_i&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\" &#92;Psi(&#92;bold{x}) = &#92;sum &#92;phi^*_i(&#92;bold{x}) a_i\" class=\"latex\" \/>.<\/p><p>The Heisenberg representation of quantum mechanics moves\u00a0the time-dependence of the wavefunction to the operators. Using that here we finally have arrived at quantum field theory. The fields described by quantum field theory are these fields of operators, <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s0.wp.com\/latex.php?latex=+%5CPsi%28%5Cbold%7Bx%7D%29&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002\" alt=\" &#92;Psi(&#92;bold{x})\" class=\"latex\" \/>. They&#8217;re defined on 3-dimensional space, since they operate on M-dimensional Fock-space where M is the number of orthogonal multi-particle states that span the available space. These operator fields are free to fluctuate in magnitude. The operators operate on the current state of the fields. The background state is time-independent, and so all dynamics is in the field operators. (While the operators are the interesting, evolving quantities, they must ultimately be applied to the state to refer to the state of the system.) Commutation relations enforce the underlying quantization of the single-particle wavefunctions.<\/p><p>So this is the object that is studied by quantum field theory. The next question is, what are the dynamics of these fields?<\/p><p>In classical field theories, often the field equations of motion are\u00a0not\u00a0derived from microscopic equations, but instead they come from reasoning about symmetries and conserved quantities. For example, the Navier-Stokes equations describing fluid flow are often derived by postulating a continuous field and conserving mass, momentum, and energy, independent of any atomic picture. \u00a0However, there is also a more complicated, microscopic approach to deriving Navier-Stokes that starts from Boltzmann&#8217;s equation for particle motions and an assumed scattering kernel. The situation is the same\u00a0in QFT. The equation of motion of the field operators can be derived (amazingly) from the single-particle Schr\u00f6dinger equation, as long as there are no interactions between particles. In more complex cases, the approach is often to use the symmetries of the problem to determine the properties of the equation of motion. These procedures lead to the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations for relativistic bosons and fermions.<\/p><p>This post comes out of discussions from the book Advanced Quantum Mechanics by Schwabl, Quantum Field Theory by Schwatrz, Wikipedia, and discussion with Zlatko T and Matt W.<br \/>\n<!-- \/\/ $latex i\\hbar\\frac{\\partial}{\\partial t}\\left|\\Psi(t)\\right&gt;=H\\left|\\Psi(t)\\right&gt;$ &nbsp; --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are several things that can still be confusing about\u00a0quantum field theory (QFT) even if one already knows\u00a0quantum mechanics.\u00a0 For example, how does QFT\u00a0relate to the\u00a0single-particle Schr\u00f6dinger equation? For one, a single particle wave function is already a continuous field, but quantum field theory refers to more than single-particle quantum mechanics. Moreover, we know that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-physics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5Yxym-4W","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=306"}],"version-history":[{"count":58,"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1024,"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306\/revisions\/1024"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tasharp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}